Indigenous Systems vs. Legal Uniformity: The Battle for Legal Pluralism
Cherry Singhal, 2nd year BA-LLB (Hons.) Student, Himachal Pradesh National Law University, Shimla
Vansh Chadha, 4th year BBA-LLB (Hons.) Student, Himachal Pradesh National Law University, Shimla
Abstract
The intricate legal landscape of India upholds the coexistence of indigenous legal systems and the modern statutory framework. Currently the Indian justice system faces a tussle between the jurisprudential principle of legal pluralism and the potential implementation of a Uniform Civil Code (UCC). Rooted in historical precedents as well, legal pluralism in India allows diverse religious communities to retain their own civil laws, particularly in matters concerning personal laws. This fosters a legal environment that reflects India’s rich cultural and religious tapestry while maintaining a largely unified legal system. However, Article 44 of the Indian Constitution’s Directive Principles of State Policy proposes a UCC, which would establish a single set of laws governing personal matters across all religious communities. While the UCC strives for gender equality and a more just legal system, its implementation necessitates navigating the complexities of balancing secular law with respect for religious and cultural diversity. Achieving a UCC that upholds traditions while embracing progressive ideals requires a nuanced understanding of legal pluralism and the role of indigenous legal systems within India. This research underscores the importance of further exploring these intricacies to inform the development of effective legal frameworks that respect India’s pluralistic nature while advancing principles of justice and equality for all.
Keywords: Legal pluralism, India, Uniform Civil Code, Indigenous Laws
Disclaimer: No part of this publication may be reproduced or copied in any form by any means without prior written permission of the Editorial Team of Multidisciplinary Legal Affairs Journal. The Editorial Team of Multidisciplinary Legal Affairs Journal holds the copyright to all works contributed to this publication. The views expressed in this publication are purely personal opinions of the authors and do not reflect the views of the Editorial Team of Multidisciplinary Legal Affairs Journal. Though all efforts are made to ensure the accuracy and correctness of the information published, Multidisciplinary Legal Affairs Journal shall not be responsible for any errors caused due to oversight or otherwise.